Climate Deal Changes Nothing

U.N. climate official Christiana Figueres, right, talks with delegates at the climate change summit as it nears it's end in the city of Durban, South         AP – U.N. climate official Christiana Figueres, right, talks with delegates at the climate change summit

Climate deal doesn’t make things worse — or better  JOHANNESBURG, South Africa – The hard-fought deal at a global climate conference in South Africa keeps talks alive but doesn’t address the core problem: The world’s biggest carbon polluters aren’t willing to cut emissions of greenhouse gases enough to stave off dangerous levels of global warming. With many scientists saying time is running out, a bigger part of the solution may have to come from the rise of climate-friendly technologies being developed outside the U.N. process. “We avoided a train wreck and we got some useful incremental decisions,” said Alden Meyer, of the Washington-based Union of Concerned Scientists. “The bad news is that we did very little here to affect the emissions curve which is accelerating, and the impacts of climate change which are climbing day by day.” Scientists say that if levels of greenhouse gases continue to rise, eventually the world’s climate will reach a tipping point, with irreversible melting of some ice sheets and a several-foot rise in sea levels. They cannot pinpoint exactly when that would happen, but the two-decade-long climate negotiations have been focused on preventing global temperatures from rising more than 2 degrees Fahrenheit (1.2 degrees Celsius) above current levels by the end of this century. A report released before the Durban talks by the U.N. Environment Programme said greenhouse gas emissions need to peak before 2020 for the world to have a shot of reaching that target. It said that’s doable only if nations raise their emissions pledges. In Durban, they did not. Sunday’s deal extends by five years the Kyoto Protocol, the 1997 agreement that has binding emissions targets for some industrial countries but not the world’s biggest carbon polluters, China and the United States. The Durban agreement also envisions a new accord with binding targets for all countries to take effect in 2020. And it sets up the bodies that will collect, govern and distribute tens of billions of dollars to poor countries suffering the effects of climate change. “But the core question of whether more than 190 nations can cooperate in order to peak and bring down emissions to the necessary level by 2020 remains open — it is a high-risk strategy for the planet and its people,” UNEP chief Achim Steiner said. Climate talks have been bogged down by rifts between rich and poor, between fully industrialized nations and emerging economies, about how to share the burden of reducing greenhouse emissions. Held back by a skeptical Congress, the U.S. doesn’t want to commit to any binding deal unless it also imposes strict emissions targets on China and India. The latter insist their targets should be more lenient because, historically, the West has a bigger share of the blame for man-made warming. Meanwhile, the atmosphere keeps filling up with heat-trapping gases from the burning of fossil fuels. Figures from the U.N. weather agency show the three most powerful greenhouse gases reached record levels last year and were increasing at an ever-faster rate. And the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration says the total heat-trapping force from major greenhouse gases has increased 29 percent since 1990, the benchmark year in the climate talks. With that backdrop, some say the diplomatic effort to solve the climate issue has already failed, and that the answer lies in the development of green technologies outside the U.N. process. “Handing the problem to diplomats was one of the first failures,” Dan Sarewitz, professor of science policy at Arizona State University, said in an email. The idea that the global energy system could be decarbonized by anything other technological developments, driven to a large extent by national polices and businesses, “was never more than a delusion,” Sarewitz said. Roger Pielke Jr. of the University of Colorado said treaties and timetables don’t reduce emissions. “Technology reduces emissions,” he said. “International agreements are simply a means to stimulating technological innovation. In the climate debate we have confused ends and means.” Even in Durban, there was a growing recognition that the transition to a low-carbon economy must be underpinned by a revolution in new energy, said Nicholas Stern, who wrote a landmark 700-page report in 2006 on the effect of climate change on the global economy. “Many inspirational examples were showcased … in Durban, ranging from a project to develop new solar light bulbs from reused plastic bottles in the Philippines, to major water and energy conservation programs in South Africa,” Stern said. Despite technological advances, renewable energy sources like solar and wind power face big challenges, struggling to compete on cost and efficiency with fossil fuel-based energy, and still represent only a small part of the energy mix in the U.S. And in some cases it is fossil fuel production that is benefiting from technological innovation, with new techniques making it easier to drill for oil in deep water and for gas in shale beds. U.N. officials hailed the Durban conference as a success, and judged against the low expectations for climate talks following the breakdown of the much-hyped Copenhagen talks two years ago, that’s not unreasonable. Negotiators overcame gridlock in the final hours and kept the process moving by agreeing to start talks on a new binding climate pact, though they couldn’t agree on whether to call it “a protocol, another legal instrument or an agreed outcome with legal force.” Other documents in the package lay out rules for monitoring and verifying emissions reductions, protecting forests, transferring clean technologies to developing countries and scores of technical issues. “I salute the countries who made this agreement. They have all laid aside some cherished objectives of their own to meet a common purpose — a long-term solution to climate change,” said U.N. climate chief Christiana Figueres. The process now lives on, but the difficult part lies ahead: raising the targets for emissions cuts enough to slow the rise in temperatures. Right now, there are few signs suggesting that’s going to happen. That means efforts to reduce emissions through national and local regulations, and in the private sector through new technologies, “need to accelerate to full throttle,” said Michael Oppenheimer, professor of geosciences and international affairs at Princeton University. “If all countries pushed renewable energy and other low-carbon technologies with corresponding vigor while (simultaneously) pulling the various regulatory levers available to them,” Oppenheimer said, “we might have a chance to beat the benchmark of danger.”

Ritter reported from Stockholm. AP Science Writer Seth Borenstein in Washington contributed to this report.


About pagan66

I am Pagan, a Witch, a Healer, Mystic & Dreamer. I live in Service to the One. I will Protect & Respect Her bounties to my last breath. I am a Seeker of Truth, a Reformer, A Historian - an Advocate for Religious Freedom, Tolerance & Human Rights. I am a Protector of Animals & Children & those less fortunate than myself. I am a Reader & a Writer - an Artist. I am a Drummer, Gardener & Cook. I listen to the Wisdom of the Ancients. If you take a copy of the Christian Bible and put it out in the wind and the rain, soon the paper on which the words are printed will disintegrate and the words will be gone. Our bible IS the wind and the rain." Herbalist Carol McGrath as told to her by a Native-American woman. "When one defines oneself as Pagan, it means she or he follows an earth or nature religion, one that sees the divine manifest in all creation. The cycles of nature are our holy days, the earth is our temple, its plants and creatures our partners and teachers. We worship a deity that is both male and female, a mother Goddess and father God, who together created all that is, was, or will be. We respect life, cherish the free will of sentient beings, and accept the sacredness of all creation." Edain McCoy View all posts by pagan66

3 responses to “Climate Deal Changes Nothing


    u a bad witch who gonna burn in hell m’fuka……….i feel soso sorry for u man not believing in JESUS LORD SAVOR OF MAN AND THE WHOLE UNIVERSE………….u gonna get what comin’ to y’all man………..ONLY JESUS can save u man not the devil who u worship and pray to u………….u damed man u will see man…..PRAY TO JESUS NOW AND FOREVER FOR SALAVATION OF UR SOUL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • pagan66

      EYESOFJESUS – Ok, I will publicly bite seeing you have spammed my inbox for 3 weeks now. Please read the following: my profile, what this blog is dedicated to & the road map to either the nearest chemist to pick up your medication or the nearest psychiatrist to be prescribed some.

      It is people such as yourself that make religion intolerable to others.

  • Philippe Raymond

    sadly, now i know why some kind of person like this mad-self-juging-dumb-who think he’s have the rigth to insult you,very very sad.for a long time i haven’t seen somethings like that…i know that you work hard and by posting all these articles and keeping that workshop up to date,I am not this kind of strange-animal-juging-fool like he,so that is why i wanna talk with you,and till i know that you’re a woman,it is more exciting!!!but in fully respect,you understand? seeya…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: